Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Grinnell College Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores

Grinnell College is a private liberal arts college with an acceptance rate of 24%. Founded in 1846, and located in Grinnell, Iowa, Grinnell has an endowment of nearly $2 billion and a 9-to-1  student/faculty ratio. For its strengths in the liberal arts and sciences, Grinnell was awarded a chapter of the prestigious  Phi Beta Kappa  honor society. Students can choose from 42 areas of study, and the college relies on individualized planning and advising instead of core requirements. In athletics, the Grinnell Pioneers compete in the NCAA Division III Midwest Conference. Popular sports include football, soccer, basketball, and cross country.   Considering applying to Grinnell College? Here are the admissions statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, Grinnell College had an acceptance rate of 24%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 24 students were admitted, making Grinnells admissions process highly competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 7,349 Percent Admitted 24% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 26% SAT Scores and Requirements Grinnell College requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 48% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 670 740 Math 700 780 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that most of Grinnells admitted students fall within the top 20% nationally on the SAT. For the evidence-based reading and writing section, 50% of students admitted to Grinnell scored between 670 and 740, while 25% scored below 670 and 25% scored above 740. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 700 and 780, while 25% scored below 700 and 25% scored above 780. Applicants with a composite SAT score of 1520 or higher will have particularly competitive chances at Grinnell. Requirements At Grinnell, the SAT writing section is optional. Note that Grinnell participates in the scorechoice program, which means that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each section across all SAT test dates. Grinnell does not require SAT Subject test scores. ACT Scores and Requirements Grinnell College requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 52% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 32 35 Math 28 33 Composite 30 34 This admissions data tells us that most of Grinnells admitted students fall within the top 7% nationally on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Grinnell received a composite ACT score between 30 and 34, while 25% scored above 34 and 25% scored below 30. Requirements Note that Grinnell does not superscore ACT results; your highest composite ACT score will be considered. At Grinnell, the ACT writing section is optional. GPA Grinnell College does not provide data about admitted high school students high school GPAs. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph Grinnell College Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to Grinnell College. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in  with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances Grinnell College has a highly competitive admissions pool with a low acceptance rate and high average SAT/ACT scores. However, Grinnell has a holistic admissions process involving other factors beyond your grades and test scores. A strong application essay and glowing letters of recommendation can strengthen your application, as can participation in meaningful extracurricular activities and a rigorous course schedule. Note that a personal interview is not required, but is strongly encouraged. Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their test scores are outside of Grinnells average range. In the graph above, the blue and green dots represent accepted students. You can see that most students who got into Grinnell had at least A- averages, SAT scores (ERWM) above 1300, and ACT composite scores above 28. A winning application, however, is about more than good grades and test scores. If you look at the red on the graph (rejected students), youll see that several students with high grades and test scores were rejected from Grinnell. If You Like Grinnell, You Might Be Interested Other Liberal Arts Colleges: Amherst | Bowdoin | Claremont McKenna | Davidson | Haverford | Middlebury | Pomona | Swarthmore | Vassar | Washington and Lee | Wellesley | Wesleyan | Williams All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and Grinnell College Undergraduate Admissions Office.

Friday, May 15, 2020

The Pros and Cons of Hunting - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 337 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/09/12 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? In todays world, the pros and cons of hunting may not be apparently clear, as hunting for sustenance has largely given way to hunting for sport. Even so, hunting still plays in an important role in the environment. But at what cost? Lets take a look at some of the positives and negatives of hunting. The Cons Of Hunting One glaring negative of hunting for sport is over hunting. This occurs when hunters kill too many of a species, threatening their survival. This is not much of an issue today, at least in the US, as regulations prevent the hunting of endangered animals. However, in the not-so-distant past, some species were hunted to near extinction, like the American Buffalo. The cougar was also locally exterminated in most areas of the country to protect livestock. However, the elimination of such an apex predator led to explosions in the deer population. The Positives Of Hunting Hunting is a great outdoor experience providing fresh air and plenty of exercise. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Pros and Cons of Hunting" essay for you Create order An experienced hunter is knowledgeable about nature and wildlife. Hunting is also an important survival skill to have if you ever find yourself stranded in the wild. It wasnt that long ago when humans had to hunt to survive. Guided hunting or hunting in groups also provides for good bonding and social experiences. Hunting also leads to animal population control. Although some predators have been eliminated, today that role is being filled by man who enjoys hunting deer for sport. Therefore, the hunting is necessary to restore natures balance. Although rare, inevitably there are going to be hunting accidents. Most of these are caused when hunters mistake other hunters for prey. It is important to exercise safe hunting practices and wear proper clothing to identify yourself to other hunters to avoid injury or death. When done right and for the right reasons, hunting can be a safe, fun and valuable activity. Once youve familiarized yourself with the pros and cons of hunting, its up to you to decide where you stand.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Napoleon Crossing the Alps Historical Meaning Behind the...

Napoleon crossing the Alps is also is the title given to the five versions of oil on canvas equestrian portrait of Napoleon Bonaparte painted by the French artist Jacques-Louis David between 1801 and 1805. Initially commissioned by the Spanish Ambassador to France, the composition shows a strongly idealized view of the real crossing that Napoleon and his army made across the Alps through the Great St. Bernard Pass in May 1800. Napoleon comes across to me as a leader in many different of ways. Jacques- Louis David is the creator of this painting. He has put certain devices and effects in his work to help the viewers come to a certain opinion and have a certain type of an impression of Napoleon. This was after Napoleon had took his army a†¦show more content†¦Another artist had actually created this picture with Napoleon being on a mule to make him seem lower then David tried to make him out to be. Napoleon came across to me as a leader because of several different things. The main thing was him being on a horse and not a mule. His clothes were very crisp and clean just like a king or leaders would have been. Also his one hand on the reins represents him being in control. Napoleon appears extremely calm and his horse seems to have terror written all over his face. The horse represents the country and he represents the leader of the country. His calm look reinsures the people of the country that everything will be ok and he has everything under control. Another big part of this picture is the wind. David has the wind blowing extremely hard towards the way Napoleon is trying to go towards. You can tell that the wind is very strong by looking at the horse’s main and tail. Also Napoleons cape and side burns are also blowing in the same direction as the wind is. You can tell which way he is going because Napoleon is pointing with his hand. The artist made the wind go in the same direction that he was traveling towards to show that god was working with him on his journey and not against him. There is a rock in the bottom left corner of the painting. This rock means a lot more then just a normal rock. This rock has names on it of people who have crossed the Alps. Some of the names that are

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

How a Knowledge Claim Can Be Tested for Justification free essay sample

I personally believe that everyone’s truths are different as each ones reality is different. What is true for me may not be true for someone else. For example I believe life is difficult, it is a struggle, you have to work hard and persevere whereas for somebody else the truth maybe that life is easy and things happen effortlessly. Thus people’s beliefs and experiences are there truth. Both claim maybe different but they both are true to the person experiencing them. How can a knowledge claim be tested for justification? Let’s take the example of history. Is everything we read about fact? How much of what we read in our History textbooks is actually the author’s perception of the truth. Let’s take the example of various wars that have taken place between Pakistan and India. Indian Historians perception of the war obviously favors India whereas Pakistan Historians have recorded the same history favorable to the Pakistanis. We will write a custom essay sample on How a Knowledge Claim Can Be Tested for Justification? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Recent research has proven that a common man from Pakistan believes that they won the Kargil war whereas a common Indian also believes that India won the war. So what is the truth? Our historians from both countries lying. No I believe that it is simply different versions of the truth. Before we belief a claim to be true we must identify whether the person making the claim has any personal relationship or involvement with the claim. If he stands to gain personally or may have a bias opinion due to personal beliefs then we have reason to doubt his claim. Also your memory and personal relationship with a person making a claim can test the reliability of the claim. In certain cases it may also cause you to doubt a claim that is actually true. For example if I Know a friend who has a tendency to exaggerate and make belief things then even if he is speaking the truth my own judgment of him can cause me to disbelief his truth. Whereas someone who I trust I may find it difficult to see through his lies. Body language is also a very important factor in determining whether one is claiming the truth or not. There are certain signs and signals that may cause me to doubt someone through close observation. For example someone cannot look me in the eye, someone being fidgety and twitching facial muscles or simply scratching their nose can give you warning signs of the possibility that claimant is lying. Conclusion- The world is not black and white and truths may not be complete truths or complete lies. There are lots of shades of grey in between the blacks and whites just as there are many possibilities and versions of the truth. When deciding whether a claim is authentic one should analyze the claim with a open mind and not let his personal judgment completely affect his conclusion.